AQUA 2024

August 26 - 30, 2024

Copenhagen, Denmark

COMPARING GROWTH AND WELFARE OF ATLANTIC SALMON POST-SMOLTS IN A NOVEL LAND-BASED COMMERCIAL HYBRID FLOW-THROUGH SYSTEM (HFS) VERSUS IN OPEN SEA PENS

Enrique Pino- Martinez*,  Asbjørn Dyrkorn Løland, Sigurd O. Handeland

*Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway

*enrique.pino@uib.no

 



The Norwegian salmon sector often uses Recirculation Aquaculture Systems (RAS ) to produce 500-700 g post-smolts, which are  transferred to sea. This  strategy shortens the  seawater  grow out phase in open net pens , thus helping to reduce the severity of problems like sea lice infestations , escapees or organic discharge in the environment. However , RAS are expensive and present a high biological complexity. In addition,  RAS post-smolts can face difficulties adapting to sea water pens , potentially impacting their growth performance and mortality.  As a result,  some  industry players are considering the use of  Hybrid Flow-Through Systems (HFS) to produce post-smolts or market-size salmon . Using HFS aims to improve  challenges resulting from the intense  RAS conditions, yet still maintaining high control of the rearing environment . However, HFS are new systems, thus salmon growth and welfare in them must be assessed.

Our study aimed to document growth and welfare in a commercial batch reared at Bue AS HFS facility (Vestland, Norway), from smolt (90 g)  in June 2023 to slaughter size (5 kg) in June 2024 . In addition, this performance  was compared with groups  of salmon  transferred from the HFS to two  traditional sea water sites, at 1 kg on 16 October 2023 ( to  SW pens  A) or  at  2 kg  on 10 December 2023 ( to  SW pens  B). Five samplings  were carried out , 3 at Bue HFS only, and 2 more ( only one by abstract submission) in the three sites (n=15-20 fish per tank/sampling).

On 12 March 2024 (4th sampling), body w eight  was over 50% higher at the HFS than at the two sea water sites (Fig. 1) , and SGR  was almost double (Table I) . Weight and SGR in sites  A and B were similar . Welfare-wise, s almon in site B displayed more winter ulcers, fin damage and mortality than the in HFS and site A , which had similar values. F eed utilization (FCR) was  also worse in site B. Mean temperature was similar in the three sites, while stocking density was highest in  the HFS, medium in  site B and lowest in site A (Table I).

 The better  fish growth in HFS might be explained by  the absence of handling and disturbance , plus the controlled environment  in a land-based system . B oth groups A and B experienced transfer events that  can induce stress , reduced growth, susceptibility to disease and mortality. In the case of site B, the transfer caused scale loss, more skin ulcers and mortality . In the case of site A, fish  had the extra disturbance of  one de-lousing treatment.  In conclusion, lack of handling and  a  high-quality controlled environment  (like in HFS) can boost salmon growth.