Aquaculture Africa 2021

March 25 - 28, 2022

Alexandria, Egypt

FOOD SAFETY CONTROLS IN THE AFRICAN AQUACULTURE

 

Ian Goulding* and Margarida Correia

 



Following three decades of legislation concerning the food safety of fishery an d aquaculture  products entering international trade, s everal dominant  markets  now  require  the establishment of functional  official controls as a condition of import of these important products. This presents significant challenges for developing countries,  which experience weak governance, limited technical control capacities, and limited  basic infrastructure for compliance. Until now,  aquaculture  production in Africa has been directed mostly at  domestic consumption,  but  some countries are  now  actively seeking to develop regional and international markets for their aquaculture products.

 This paper reviews the status of development in  55  African countries of official controls for fishery and aquaculture products ,  using as indicators the establishment of Competent Authorities recognised by the European Commission, results of interceptions of non-compliant products in export markets and audits carried out on the relevant C ompetent A uthorities  responsible for food safety. Of these, 29 countries are Listed in Annex I  (concerning fishery products)  of Commission Decision and two are listed in A nnex II (concerning bivalve molluscs). Only e ight countries have been able to meet the EU conditions for aquaculture  and  26 countries are not able to export any fishery products  at all to the EU.

Potential food safety hazards of specific concern in aquaculture include residues of veterinary medicines and other treatments ,  environmental contaminants  in fish and feed (pesticides, PCBs and heavy metals) and in the case of freshwater aquaculture , fish-borne zoonotic trematodes.  The paper describes the common control  and monitoring measures used by authorities to  demonstrate protection against such hazards. This includes controls on distribution and use of veterinary medicines, design, and implementation of residue monitoring programmes for fish and feed, development of capacity of Competent Authorities for official controls on farms and in feed mills (based on HACCP principles) and effective systems of certification and correction of non-compliances.

 Trade in live fish (including  broodstock, juveniles, ova, and gametes) also introduces the risk of transmission of fish diseases. Although there is no public data to indicate the extent of adoption of A quatic A nimal Health measures , few African  countries  have developed  the  essential  systems to protect against import and transmission of industry-killing fish diseases.

 Incapacity  to  trade  aquaculture products  can generate  a significant barrier to development, confining distribution to the domestic market even at times of high production.  Since expansion  of aquaculture production  in many African countries  is central  to development policy , efforts should include  the development of  effective  food safety (and aquatic animal health) c ontrols to meet international requirements. In many cases there is a strong justification for such measures  to be applied  to  all  aquaculture production irrespective of the market, to protect consumers and provide a safe investment environment.

*MegaPesca Lda , 2460-207 Alfeizerão , PORTUGAL

megapesca@sapo.pt