Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) are commonly used for laboratory research studies of reproductive fecundity , quantified as egg number, embryo viability, and larval feeding success. However, the methods of egg collection can impact these outcomes, independent of experimental conditions. Therefore , we tested different methods of initial egg collection to determine best practices in support of fathead minnow reproductive studies.
In culture, adult fathead minnow females lay their eggs on the underside of "spawning huts" that are coated with sand to provide a rough surface that facilitates egg adherence during spawning. M ales then clean and guard the eggs through hatching, which takes approximately four days at 25 °C (Figure 1).
However, for research, eggs are usually collected within a few hours of fertilization, a process that prematurely separates eggs from the hut using manual or chemical means. Manual egg removal involves rubbing the eggs off the hut with your fingers and can mechanically damage eggs, but with the advantage that water quality is not affected. Chemical egg removal employs sodium sulfite to dissolve the adhesive that attaches eggs to the hut. Sodium sulfite avoids mechanical egg damage but can have the side effect of depriving eggs of oxygen, which may impact embryo survival and larval development and feeding . To determine which of these methods best supports fish reproductive studies, we tested the e ffects of manual and chemical egg collection on the percentage of feeding larvae obtained from spawning pairs of fathead minnows and compared these data to control larval numbers obtained when eggs are naturally raised to hatching by the male fathead minnow.