World Aquaculture Magazine - March 2021

48 MARCH 2021 • WORLD AQUACULTURE • WWW.WA S .ORG videos, interactive components and cooking competitions was appropriate (Fig. 4). However, some respondents indicated that more interactive components or delivering content over a few days rather than one long day would have been helpful. One respondent stated, “allow more time for interactive discussions … all day events are long and hard to sit through in a virtual setting, maybe attempting to split the content up over multiple days? I know that could be difficult as well . ” The response indicates attendees are still looking for informal interaction and networking opportunities regardless of in-person or virtual settings. Another interesting finding was that those who responded to the survey spent most of the day attending sessions. However, there was a slight decrease in participation as the event continued into the afternoon. This feedback suggests that future GLAC events should be divided over two to three shorter days rather than one, full-day event. Overall, the GLAD 2020 event was a success and, although it had to be virtual, we effectively integrated GLAC advisory group ideas into a format that was engaging for presenters and attendees. For example, one attendee commented, “Thanks so much for bringing this symposium to us, the industry needs more of these . ” We will use the recommendations from our survey and additional feedback from our GLAC advisory groups to guide our future efforts. To stay up to date on upcoming webinars and events, and to view the recordings for the sessions of GLAD 2020, visit the Great Lakes Aquaculture Collaborative website. Acknowledgements This work was prepared by the Great Lakes Aquaculture Collaborative under award NA19OAR4170388 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Sea Grant College Program, or the U.S. Department of Commerce. Notes Lauren N. Jescovitch and Elliot Nelson, Michigan Sea Grant & Michigan State University Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Titus Seilheimer, Wisconsin Sea Grant, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Emma Wiermaa, University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility, Bayfield, Wisconsin, USA & Wisconsin Sea Grant. Amy J. Schrank, University of Minnesota Sea Grant, Duluth, MN, USA References Engle, C. Kumar, G. and J. van Senten. 2020. Cost drivers and profitability of U.S. pond, raceway, and RAS aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 51(4):847-873. Hartman, K.H., Yanong, R.P.E., Harms, C.A. and G.A. Lewbart. 2006. The future of training for aquatic animal health veterinarians. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 33(3):389-393. Hobbs, J.E. 2020. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 68:171-176. Ivan, L.N., T.O. Brenden, I.F. Standish and M. Faisal. 2018. Individual-based model evaluation of using vaccinated hatchery fish to minimize disease spread in wild fish populations. Ecosphere 9(2) https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ ecs2.2116 Jescovitch, L.N. and C.E. Boyd. 2017. A case study: Impacts of deviating frommodel research design to the commercial industry for split-pond aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering 79: 35-41. Linkenheld, A. 2019. Temperature impacts on embryonic and larval development of yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). MS Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI. Muktar Y., S. Tesfaye and B. Tesfaye. 2016. Present status and future prospects of fish vaccination: A review. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 7:299. Osmundsen, T.C., R. Almklov and R. Tveterås. 2017. Fish farmers and regulators coping with the wickedness of aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics &Management 21(1):163-183. Rau, E. C. Riseng, L. Vaccaro and J.G. Read. 2020. The dynamic Great Lakes economy: Employment trends from 2009-2018. Michigan Sea Grant, MICHU-20-203. Runge, K.K., B.R. Shaw, L. Witzling, C. Hartleb, S. Yang and D.M. Peroff. 2020. Social license and consumer perceptions of farm-raised fish. Aquaculture 530 Article 735920. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735920 Stentiford G.D., K.Sritunyalucksana, T.W. Flegel, B.A.P. Williams, B. Withyachumnarnkul, O. Itsathitphaisarn and D. Bass. 2017. New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS Pathogens 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006160 Trushenski, J., T. Dudis and S. Shults. 2010. Final report: Increasing the availability of veterinarians for Indiana and Illinois aquaculturists. Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant project final report. https://iiseagrant.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ Trushenski2010_1.pdf van Senten, J., C. Engle, K. Hartman, K. Johnson and L. Gustafson. 2018. Is there an economic incentive for farmer participation in a uniform health standard for aquaculture farms? An empirical case study. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 156:58-67. van Senten, J., M. Smith and C. Engle. 2020. Impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. aquaculture, aquaponics, and allied businesses. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 51(3):574-577 White, E.R., H.E. Froehlich, J.A. Gephart, R.S. Cottrell, T.A. Branch, R.A. Bejarano and J.K. Baum. 2020. Early effects of COVID-19 on U.S. fisheries and seafood consumption. Fish and Fisheries 00:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12525 Witzling, L., B. Shaw, S. Yang, K. Runge, C. Hartleb and D. Peroff. 2020. Predictors of environmental policy support: The case of inland aquaculture in Wisconsin. Environmental Communication 14:1097-1110. World Bank. 2014. Reducing Disease Risk in Aquaculture. World Bank Report Number 88257-GLB. Yang, S., B. Shaw, L. Witzling, C. Hartleb, K. Runge and D. Peroff. 2019. Aquaculture in Wisconsin: Results from a statewide survey of fish farmers. Report. Report. https:// fyi.extension.wisc.edu/localfoodmarketing/files/2019/10/ AquacultureProducerReport-10-3-2019.pdf