World Aquacluture Magazine - September 2020
WWW.WA S.ORG • WORLD AQUACULTURE • SEP TEMBER 2020 57 char (141-367 mmTL), compared to the same number of brook trout (122-314 mmTL) and Arctic char (112-433 mmTL, Fig. 10). The average coefficient of condition (K) indicated that the weight of hybrid Arctic char at a given length (K = 1.21) was greater than that of brook trout (K = 1.16) and Arctic char (K = 0.92). Hybrid Growth and Survival Hybrid Arctic char demonstrate hybrid vigor (Sutterlin et al . 1977). The growth rate of hybrid Arctic char was comparable to brook trout in this study, although hybrid Arctic char grew faster than pure strain brook trout in the study conducted by Sutterlin et al. (1977). Hybrid Arctic char grew faster than pure strain Arctic char at the Cobleskill hatchery. Further, survival following spawning and total biomass production was better in Arctic char hybrids than in brook trout raised in cold water (Dumas et al . 1996). Conclusion Hatchery-reared hybrid Arctic char are much more successful reproducing at NewYork’s photoperiods and groundwater temperatures than pure Arctic char. While fertilization, eye-up and hatching success was variable between pairings, there was net improvement between generations. Unfortunately, the hybrid Arctic char do not breed true. Even after ten generations of strong selection against the vermiculations characteristic of brook trout, there was still a significant percentage of hybrid Arctic char with dorsal vermiculations. A similar phenomenon seems to have naturally occurred in northern Quebec, where brook trout and Arctic char introgressed leaving apparent “brook trout” populations carrying Arctic char genes (Bernatchez et al . 1995, Glemet et al . 1998). Arctic char × brook trout hybrids have a greater condition factor than pure strain Arctic char or brook trout. Further, in several places in Europe, the flesh fromArctic char × brook trout hybrids is highly appreciated by consumers (Gross et al . 2004). However, it may be too early to recommend or dismiss Arctic char hybrids as an alternative for coldwater fish farming in the United States. The results from this study encourage further consideration. Perhaps with more sophisticated breeding techniques and DNA analysis, hatch rates and morphological characteristics will be improved so that the culture of Arctic char can be expanded to more southern latitudes. Acknowledgments This researchwas supported by grants from the Appalachian Regional Commission, USDA– Cooperative State Research, SUNYResearch Initiative and the Empire State Development Fund to the senior author. Amultitude of SUNYCobleskill Fisheries andAquaculture students assistedwith this project. References Bernatchez, L., L. Glemet, C.C. Wilson, and R.G. Danzmann. 1995. Introgression and fixation of Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) mitochondrial genome in an allopatric population of brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ). Can. J. Fish. and Aquatic Sci. 52(1):179-185. Bebak-Williams, J. 2001. Final Project Report for USDA/ARS Grant No. 59-1930-6-038, Arctic Char: Development of Production Technologies Suited toWater Resources in Appalachia. The Conservation Fund’s Freshwater Institute, Shepherdstown, WV, 43 pp. Brannas, E. and J. Linner. 2000. Growth effects in Arctic charr reared in cold water: Feed frequency, access to bottom feeding and stocking density. Aquaculture International 8: 381-389. Delabbio, J. 1995. Arctic char culture in Atlantic Canada. In: Boghen, A.D. (Ed.), Cold-Water Aquaculture in Atlantic Canada, 2 nd ed. The Canadian Institute for Research on Regional Development, Moncton, Canada, pp. 85-106. Dumas, S., J.M. Blanc, F. Vallee, C. Audet and J. Noue. 1996. Survival, growth, sexual maturation and reproduction of brook charr, arctic charr, and their hybrids. Aquaculture Research 27(4):245-253. Gass, T.E. 1982. Geothermal heat pumps. Geothermal Resources Council Bulletin 11:3-8. Gillet, C. 1991. Egg production in an Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus L.) brood stock: Effects of temperature on the timing of spawning and the quality of eggs. Aquatic Living Resources 4(2):109-116. Glemet, H., P. Blier and L. Bernatchez. 1998. Geographical extent of Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpines ) mtDNA introgression in brook char populations ( S. fontinalis ) from eastern Quebec, Canada. Molecular Ecology 7:1655-1662. Gross, R., B. Gum, R. Reiter and R. Kuhn. 2004. Genetic introgression between Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus ) and brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) in Bavarian hatchery stocks inferred from nucleolar and mitochondrial DNAmarkers. Aquaculture International 12:19-32. Kazyak, D., B.H. Letcher, J. Zydlewski and O.J. Matthew. 2014. Growth variability of brook charr ( Salvelinus fontin alis) in coastal Maine. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 23:516-526. Hammar, J.J., B. Dempson and E. Verspoor. 1991. Natural hybridization between Arctic Char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) and Brook Trout ( S . fontinalis ): Evidence from northern Labrador. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1437-1445. Lee, D.S., C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister and J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. Volume 1980. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC, USA. McAfee, W.R. 1966. Eastern brook trout. Pages 242-260. In : A. Calhoun, editor. Inland Fisheries Management. California Department of Fish and Game. Ocalewicz, K., P. Hliwa, K. Pomianowski, R. Lisboa andM. Jankun. 2014. Cytogenetic and histological studies of the brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill), and the Arctic char, S. alpinus (L.) hybrids. Aquaculture International 22:281-288. Phillips R.B and P. Ráb 2001. Chromosome evolution in the Salmonidae (Pisces): an update. Biological Review 76:1-25. Scott, W.B. and E.J. Crossman 1973. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 184. Ottawa, Canada. Summerfelt, S.A., G. Wilton, D. Roberts, T. Rimmer and K. Fonkalsrud. 2004. Developments in recirculating systems for Arctic char culture in North America. Aquacultural Engineering 30:31-71. Sutterlin, A.M., R.H. Peterson and A. Sreadharan. 1977. Growth, physiology and behaviour of salmonid hybrids. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, ices.dk/sites/pub/CM%20 Doccuments/1977/M/1977_M24.pdf Tave, D. 1993 Genetics for Fish HatcheryManagers, 2nd edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork. Thorarinsdottir, R.I. 2013. Prospects of farming arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ). Aquaculture Europe, Trondheim, Norway 2(6):107.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjExNDY=